Schriftkritik platonic relationship

Project MUSE - On Reading Plato Mimetically

ties within a “zetetic” category, classing a number of Platonic dialogues in accordance with gymnastic .. Platonic scholars who study “the content in close relation to the form of “Platons Schriftkritik und die Grenzen der Mitteilbarkeit.” In Ro-. Transcribing Plato's voice: the Platonic intertext between writtenness and .. in the Platonic corpus itself the relationship between written text and intellectual ERLER, M., - 'Platons Schriftkritik in historischen Kontext', AU, 28 () [Passages of the Phaedrus and of any other Platonic dialogue are quoted from J. , , W. WIELAND, Platons Schriftkritik und die Grenzen der according to the Phaedrus, it is this solitary relation of the self (of the soul) to itself .

Taurus composes a commentary on the Gor- gias 7. Diogenes Laertius offers a systematic compendium, in 10 books, of the Greek philosophical biographies and doctrines The whole of Book 3 is dedicated to Plato.

Platonic love

Compositionally, it breaks down into four sections The biographical sketch I and survey of the corpus II abound in written features of every kind. As in Gellius, the dialogues are perceived as titled texts 4, 25, 57, etc. The quantity and tenor of such material give the impression that Diogenes Laertius or maybe the compilatory source behind him is trying to rub in the writtenness of Platonic discourse Episodes and references that draw upon the idioms of orality are not simply outnumbered but repeatedly sabotaged from within, as it were.

On one anecdotal occasion Plato confronts and quickly checkmates a script that Antisthenes was about to read out, yet this too is a Pyrrhic vic- tory for orality as it triggers a written riposte: Antisthenes goes on to pen a polemical dialogue in return Throughout the summary not a single citation or explicit reference to the dialogues is made.

Instead, the Platonic teaching speaks itself out in a voice that transcends its own foundational texts. Putting it 27 Socrates of Book 3 is of course enveloped in orality: With a will, both procedures could be interpreted as ricochets from the problematics of writing in the Phaedrus and the 7th Epistle.

In his moral diatribes Platonic intertextuality does not get switched on often. Epictetus is obviously aware that Pla- to is a literary classic whose written style people imitate 2.

For Epictetus the written text qua text is a distinct from its ideo- logical message, and therefore b must not be our priority as readers Given that Epictetus would forcefully subordinate textuality to ethical training, it is foreseeable that he normally does not identify the Platonic texts he is loosely referring to 2.

Fur- thermore, several almost verbatim quotations from Plato are consciously recycled as moral mantras Ench. There is no question that these lines are famous and easily recognizable on their own. Epictetus in effect mobilizes the Platonic intertext in order to help his audience onto a conceptual plane where writtenness and intertextuality itself become largely irrelevant.

His Plato is either oralized 1. Listen, what does Socrates say? As a Stoic moralist Epictetus has a sort of vested inter- est in the Socratic paradigm and clearly tries it on himself IV To sum up. In Dioge- nes Laertius Platonic writtenness is provocatively displayed yet counterpointed by quasi-oral recital of the doctrinal clauses.

It may be rash to construe any of this as point-blank response to the Phaedrus and the 7th Epistle. Platonis ex libro qui appella- bis dicit quotation follows: Plato asked what he Plato and Isocrates: Criticism and Subjectivity in Barthes, Foucault and Derrida, 2nd ed.

Share Shares Neither family, nor privilege, nor wealth, nor anything but Love can light that beacon which a man must steer by when he sets out to live the better life. Many people believe it is, and that little is possible without love as a motivator.

Love is multi-faceted and comes in many forms: What does a modern, healthy platonic relationship look like, and how do we keep it that way? What Is Platonic Love? Plato wrote about love in his work, the Symposium, a dialogue where the guests of a banquet each gave speeches in honor of the god Eros and debated the true meaning of love. Instead, it was a love that inspired nobler pursuits, and brought one closer to the divine.

  • Navigation menu
  • 3 Characteristics Of Platonic Love
  • What Is Platonic Love?

It brought about the best in both people. Clearly, today this is no longer completely the case. And like its ancient origins, the expectation of a platonic relationship today is relatively the same: It is rooted in genuine honesty, and the ability to be yourself around that person without fear of censure, or abandonment.

3 Characteristics Of Platonic Love: A Connection Of A Different Kind

The following three characteristics of platonic love will help you recognize it, manage your expectations of it, and keep that relationship happy, and healthy, and thriving for years to come. Unfiltered Honesty There is little need for deceit in a purely platonic relationship. Unlike in a romantic relationship, there is no fear that the person will leave you because they were never with you in the first place.

You can have a fight, not speak for a month, then patch things up, and things will pretty much go back to normal. There is no need to maintain a facade.

3 Characteristics Of Platonic Love: A Connection Of A Different Kind

In some sense, this brutal honesty is great; in fact, it is often a relief. You can ask the unaskable questions, and not have to worry too much about the status of your relationship. You can talk openly about your dating troubles, and share your personal gaffes without worrying about how it makes you look. A romantic relationship is less like a rock, and more like a flower.

It has to be carefully cultivated, and taken care of; it is fragile and liable like a flower to die without the proper attention.

This is when the real work begins. Platonic love is much less delicate and can weather these ups and downs.