Federal assistance relationship

Healthy Marriage | Office of Family Assistance | ACF

federal assistance relationship

Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number C-DER Library Icon Is used to enter into a relationship the principal purpose of which is to transfer. Posted 16 days ago. Under general supervision of the Commercial Relationship Managers, provide diversified support to See this and similar. The relationship and authority of states and the federal government are Federal assistance funds, including funds that will be passed through.

An Observation of the State-Federal Relationship: July/August 2010

Use professional judgment in determining if an entity is a subrecipient or a vendor. In making this determination, the substance of the relationship is more important than the form of the agreement. A federal agency that provides federal awards must provide the following information to its recipients: Uniform Guidance 2 CFR The term research also includes activities involving the training of individuals in research techniques where such activities utilize the same facilities as other research and development activities and where such activities are not included in the instruction function.

Once the federal government sends funds to an agency, the following information summarizes the possible federal interagency pass-through relationships: Agencies must determine whether to account for federal funds as a pass-through or payment for goods and services.

Use the chart below to assist in this decision: Determines who is eligible to receive the federal financial assistance. Provides the goods and services within normal business operations. Has its performance measured against whether the objectives of the federal program are met. Has responsibility for programmatic decision-making.

federal assistance relationship

Operates in a competitive environment. Has responsibility for adherence to applicable federal program compliance requirements. Fiscal shortfalls and constitutional requirements for balanced budgets restrain the capacity of the states to maintain their traditional priorities in K and higher education, transportation and health care.

At the same time, the ability of the federal government to deficit spend, particularly as a counter to recession, allows it to expand its initiatives and, if it desires, direct states to act in particular ways at a time when it is very difficult for them to resist.

federal assistance relationship

The Obama administration has expanded the use of the carrot in federal financial assistance to achieve its goals, particularly in education with the Race to the Top competition for funds. State and local governments still provide more than 90 percent of K education funding, but the federal government has found an effective means of nationalizing goals through its much smaller share of the funding.

Pushback has begun, however, with a number of states opting not to participate. Whether this is a temporary change in the state-federal relationship or a more permanent one remains to be seen. There certainly has been a growth in the percentage of federal funds in state budgets over the last 50 years, with Medicaid the big ticket item.

Medicaid is now the primary vehicle for the expansion of health care to the uninsured.

An Observation of the State-Federal Relationship

It currently accounts for 21 percent of state budgets and grows by the year. Under the vast new federal health reform, conflicts over the regulation of insurers, the operations of the exchange programs and risk pool funding are unavoidable.

The temporary stimulus of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act funds soon will be over and their impact on cushioning state budgets from the downturn will be gone. What remains will be a large federal deficit.

Future federal spending on domestic discretionary programs will be flat or declining. Reducing the deficit will require reduced spending or new revenues, or both. Either solution will affect state governments. The search for new revenues could have a major effect on traditional state revenue sources, particularly a national Value Added Tax on state sales taxes.

It is easy to see considerable state-federal tension arising from this debate. Many of the formal mechanisms of intergovernmental cooperation have been eliminated.