I appreciate you taking the time to meet

i appreciate you taking the time to meet

I really appreciate you taking the time to engage with my article so thoughtfully, Tim! I know this isn't how serious historians write today. Please not that "I appreciate your taking YOUR time" and "I appreciate you taking I don't know what the linguists are going to say our intuitive grammars do, but. Would you say "I appreciate him taking the time to meet with me" or "I appreciate You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

As seen in 1, it should be obvious that we don't appreciate the bully.

i appreciate you taking the time to meet

Also, here's an active voice example: And here are some examples that have dummy subjects: She is wrong here. Hold steady, and do it the right way.

I Appreciate You/Your Taking the Time? | Grammar Underground with June Casagrande

That right there is just laughable, except people believe it. We native English speakers say it that way, and it is a "correct" way.

Much clearer this time, because the object of your affection is the singing, not the tenor himself. Whose singing do you love? It is still ambiguous: The OP's title example: Note then that while Kim didn't like his singing is ambiguous according as singing is a noun or a verb, Kim didn't like him singing is unambiguous, with singing necessarily a verb.

Is "I appreciate your taking the time to do this" grammatically correct? : grammar

In the noun interpretation we are concerned with the manner of his singing cf. Kim didn't like his singing of this difficult ariawhereas in the verbal interpretation it is a matter of the activity or fact of his singing cf.

Kim didn't like him singing obscene songs. In your example, the complement is a clause; and it is a catenative complement where the intervening noun phrase "your" or "you" is not an object of the matrix verb "appreciate", but rather, that noun phrase is the subject of the -ing clause i. And so, that catenative complement will only have the verbal interpretation cf.

I appreciate your taking the time to speak with me about your haunted house!

Interestingly, Grammar Girl uses the singing example as a name of one of her article's files! I realize you were pointing out the correct use of the object pronoun "me," but the word "you" in the sentence is incorrect because "taking" is a gerund that necessitates the possessive pronoun "your.

i appreciate you taking the time to meet

While we were aware of the writer's grammatical problem with "you" instead of the correct "your" last week, we decided to overlook that error to focus solely on the writer's question concerning "me" as an object. We agree that in addition to using "me" in the correct sample, the writer should have used "your" so that the sentence would read as follows: I appreciate your taking the time to meet with John and me last week.

MODERATORS

In the future our editorial policy will be to revise questions with errors so that they appear in correct grammatical form. Do I need to capitalize the first letter of a title or position when writing in context form, considering there is no name of a person before and after the title? Assuming that you are referring to a position in the signature or title area of a business document, the short answer is yes: Sincerely, Customer Service Manager If the term is used in the middle of a document to refer to a generic position, then it would not have to be capitalized: We need to hire a customer service manager in the near future.

Where can I learn about the appropriate editing marks for proofreading a news article?

i appreciate you taking the time to meet

Many grammar books offer sections with this information, and bookstores often carry many types of writing style guides. Journalistic publications or publishers frequently provide guidelines for a preferred editorial style.