Jean de Florette - Wikipedia
Aug 5, I prefer Jean de Florette even so, but it's not worth being a dick about It is, in all ways, a film about the relationship of the land and the people. Jun 21, ''Jean de Florette,'' it can safely be said, is like no other film you've seen Then, at the end, there comes, for the Papet, a stunningly terrible fate. Aug 7, If you were to walk into the middle of "Jean de Florette," you would see a scene that might mislead you.
Type 4 in Manon of the Spring. Manon, Ugolin, and Bernard. The general attitude towards Manon after she grows up. Jean wasn't bad looking, but because he was a hunchback, the villagers considered him ugly. And although the deaths they cause are accidental, both times they show little remorse and quickly jump to how to take advantage of the situation.
He just goes way, way too far to make that happen. Manon by the time of Manon of the Spring gives this impression to the village people. However she still has the good education her father gave her, and spends much of her time reading. You Killed My Father: Your Son All Along: In the first film, the protagonist wants the titular Jean to sell him his land, and plays many tricks on him to pursuade him to do so. It doesn't help that Jean is the son of his childhood sweetheart Florette, who left him and married another man while he was away at war.
Jean de Florette (France, 1986)
Simultaneously, she is attracted to a newcomer to the town, Bernard Olivier Hippolyte Girardot. Then the past returns to haunt Cesar and Ugolin, as it is revealed that the two conspired to hide the spring's existence from Jean, causing his death. Learning of this, Manon embarks upon a course of revenge. By the end of the film, Ugolin has hanged himself and Cesar has had the most bitter shock imaginable. Jean Cadoret, the man he worked so assiduously to destroy, was his son by Florette.
The Soubeyran line thus ends because of his own actions. One noteworthy difference between the two films is the variance in tones. The first movie is lighter, due in large part to the boundless optimism displayed by Jean. There are times when it seems that he might succeed despite the obstacles thrown in his way by Cesar and Ugolin. Ugolin, meanwhile is deeply conflicted about his actions. He genuinely likes Jean and wants to help him.
Only the prodding of Cesar and dreams of thousands of carnations keep him from revealing the truth about the spring. His actions are despicable, but he is not, and a pleasant sort of camaraderie develops between Jean and Ugolin. Manon des Sources is a grim motion picture. The tables are turned, bitterly and without pity, on Ugolin and Cesar as Manon sets out to avenge her dead father.
Once she learns that these two were behind the deception that resulted in Jean's death, she acts decisively. Ironically, her decision - to cut off the town's water supply at its source - is not what finishes either of her enemies.
Ugolin is consumed by his own unrequited love and self-loathing. Cesar learns the bitter truth from an old acquaintance who returns to the village after a lengthy absence. Although the overall length about four hours in total and presence of subtitles will intimidate many potential viewers, those who venture into the world of Jean de Florette will find their efforts rewarded.
- Navigation menu
- Contains examples of:
- Jean de Florette (France, 1986)
This is one of the most powerful, emotionally complex tales ever translated from the written page to the silver screen. Marcel Pagnol wrote the novel that serves as the source material. It is a tragedy of epic proportions, but on a very personal scale. We feel for all these characters and what they have lost, even those that, in the hands of a less adept filmmaker, might have come across as cookie-cutter bad guys. We feel no joy in their inevitable downfall.
Nor, for that matter, does Manon, although she sheds no tears when Ugolin perishes. The picture he paints is unflattering.
Jean de Florette | Reelviews Movie Reviews
Jean, whose defining characteristics are his innocence and boundless optimism, is destroyed by those around him who are motivated by deception and self-interest. There are times when Jean appears indomitable, but, in the end, even he cannot overcome the cruelty of nature and his fellow men. Ugolin and Cesar are not the only guilty ones; the village inhabitants aid in the concealment by remaining silent. Later, the dusty winds of the sirocco also arrive, bringing the farm to near-catastrophe.
Jean is undeterred, and decides to dig a well. At this point Ugolin sees it fitting to try and convince Jean that his project is hopeless, and that he might be better off selling. Jean asks how much he could expect to receive for the farm, and Ugolin gives an estimate of around 8, francs. Jean has no intention of leaving though, but wants to use the value of the property to take up a mortgage of half that sum. Ugolin is not happy, but Papet again sees opportunity: From the money Jean buys dynamite to finish the well, but in his first blast is hit by a flying rock and falls into the cavity.
At first the injuries seem minor, but it turns out his spine is fractured and when the doctor arrives he declares Jean dead. Ugolin returns with the news to Papet, who asks him why he's crying. As mother and daughter are packing their belongings, Papet and Ugolin make their way to where they blocked the spring, to pull out the plug. Manon follows them, and when she sees what the two are doing, understands and gives out a shriek.
The men hear it, but quickly dismiss the sound as that of a buzzard making a kill. As Papet performs a mock baptism of his nephew in the cold water of the spring, the film ends with the caption "end of part one".
In the local dialect "Papet" is an affectionate term for "grandfather". Eager to restore his family's position, he manipulates his nephew to do his bidding. Jean is a city man with a romantic idea of the countryside, yet obstinate and hard-working. Jean's beautiful wife is a former opera singer, who has named her daughter after her favourite role, Manon Lescaut.
Production[ edit ] Marcel Pagnol 's film Manon des Sources was four hours long, and subsequently cut by its distributor.
The end result left Pagnol dissatisfied, and led him to retell the story as a novel.